Paternity Fraud/Children for Profit

http://fixthefoc.com

In 1985 at the age of 19,easily mislead and a child by experience my self I was coerced by the means of fraud into a marriage, with the one thing most hold dearly to there hearts, the privilege of child birth and becoming a parent to pass on the heritage of the family tree, that generations before have held the pride of being part of. over a period of the next 5 years, I was striped of the privilege that in fact is a god given gift. The freedom of my next 20 years was in the hands of many that would determine literally my destiny at there will by opinion and discretion. I HAVE NOW BEEN PLACED IN THE HANDS OF THE SYSTEM, The Bay County Friend Of The Court, commonly referred to as the FOC, I soon came to realize it was (FAILURE OF THE CHILDREN). With 2 children being born into, but not products of the marriage, I soon began the quest to protect the right of my family heritage, and the best interest of both children. The conception of fraud is unfair to all. Because of LAWS and POWERS the judge holds to determine what is best for My children I was told you can not see your children. Your visitation rights are terminated, all because of his personal opinion, as he demonstrated on the record by referring to his own family heritage and children. while holding confidence in my hired counsel I was lead to make some bad choices through out the proceedings of the divorce by his recommendation, keeping in mind, He was the 3rd attorney on the record in this case as I was denied the right to an attorney by the judge prior to retaining his firm. I was never charged with domestic violence, never charged with child abuse, the only thing that could be said, Is Mr Richardson is confused about his decisions.WHO WOULD NOT BE, finding out that there beliefs are nothing more then a facade of ones fraudulent ways, every thing you believed in was only created in another,s mind. So by his opinion and his unlimited discretion, I was ordered astray of a child that was my biological son of just 2 years old, and entitled to be part of my family heritage. and to financially care for a child holding my personal name only Douglas Richardson while the mother was set free to live abroad with the blood father of the non-biological child that was determined to be my legal responsibility at the age of 5 as defined best interest of the child. Enslaved over the next 15 years, from the deceit of a woman altering morality at the cost of my freedoms I am now nothing more then a number on the books of a collection agency, the friend of the court. Over this period of time, while being fully engulfed with emotions of having a SON out there in the care of another man whom holds absolutely no interest in my family heritage I set my self aside, continue on with the struggles of life holding the faith all will come to pass. Some 10 years later The mother determines she has tired of being a mom, abandons BOTH children in the house hold of the man she has striped me of my freedoms with deceit, to live with as a family and deceived both children into believing I walked away from them by the means of my own decisions, claiming to them I am a dead beat father. Growing older and much wiser, holding grave concerns to the future of both of these children,s lives, I starting refocusing on the entire process that has unfolded over the last 15 years. I am forced to go back to square one and file a motion in court representing my self to force open the doors that were literally slammed in my face 15 years earlier. Having a lot of ground to cover I start investigating court files, pulling all information from the County clerks office and the friend of the courts files Copying, and putting in sequence. Keeping in mind, I am limiting my search to certain documents because the decisions of the courts whom held authority over these childrens lives was based off the best interest of the child, as stated in court. The very first thing I begin to research is how the courts could acknowledge the mother moved out of the house, and can with out a notification to me the legal father of both, order the payments I am making go directly to this man, The biological father of the first child whom I hold all parental rights and responsibilities too as ordered by the courts themselves. I find by Michigan law a hearing and investigation must take place to protect my parental rights and the best interest of the child. It clearly states it must beyond a shadow of a doubt be in the best interest of the children, to have the children reside with a 3rd parte and under his care, and must hold legal authority to not only care for the children, but in fact receive the payments I was making. While researching abatement and redirection of child support, I find this was done with out a hearing,and no investigation what so ever, I find in a motion filed by the friend of the court, it was taken to the chief judge, whom holds authority over the friend of the courts operations stating they had received my verbal consent, but when I ask them to show me any form of notification to me, one can not be produced,as they claim its archived. I am very skeptical now of all, I start looking at the whole picture while talking to the receptionist at the Bay County Clerks office, once again looking for some kind of notification to me, or a hearing that took place, as she opens the files on Abraham Flores doing a reverse check for a hearing he may have attended being the 3rd parte payee. The file she presented to me was a felony police report, she said I would have to go to the circuit court clerk to visually see the report. She also informed me of a report I may view on the mother of the case containing a PPO order she had filed. With the Circuit court clerks office ( records) within 20 foot of the friend of the courts doors I am alarmed to find in the records a report and plea conviction against the man the courts found fit to care for these children with out the mother being present in the home. The charges were Count 1 Felony with a fire arms and count 2 Assault with a dangerous weapon. In the 27 page report I find testimony from several people including one of the children, The Assault occurred at the home of this family, the Assault was literally against this family as he held and threatened there lives with a high caliber riffle to the extent of the childrens testimony stating he would kill every one.He as well held the police at bay before surrendering him self to there custody. I also found this happened prior to the mother abandoning the children as the courts acknowledged in written correspondence. This man had no authority to legally care for the children, he held no parental rights and had proved to be a threat to there best interest, to the extent of threatening there lives at gun point, They were left in an environment of physical dangers. On March 23rd, 2006 after filing a motion to rehear the case it was agreed and determined that all payments to the mother and 3rd parte payee would be terminated, arrears in the amount of $117.00 to the 3rd parte payee, and approximately $2000 to the mother would be wiped out. It was also ordered that I WOULD have to reimburse the state of Michigan approximately $1500 for welfare received and court statutory fees by both the 3rd parte payee and the mother. It was also ordered with out question My visitation rights to my biological child be immediately reinstated. Still having unanswered questions, and new issues that were brought to my attention during the March 23rd hearing I deemed it extremely important to continue investigating all issues in the case. On the record my ex-wife made the statements she has continued to have the children on Medicaid, a service offered by the Michigan department of human services, that is tailored under welfare reform Title 4D. When in fact I have had these children on a policy of Blue Cross & Blue Shield as recognized by the courts them selves. The friend of the courts office several times over the years have retained Insurance cards from me for the children also recognized by the courts. I also have many times over the years received statements from Blue Cross Blue Shield showing the Policy was being used by the mother holding the Insurance cards as I was billed for the deductibles that she her self was ordered responsible to pay in the judgment of divorce, while she on March 23rd maintained she has never had Blue Cross Blue Shield coverage supplied to her. She was in fact using Medicaid as a primary insurance coverage, fully knowing the Blue Cross Policy existed. This Directed my attention to a new avenue, being I was even on March 23rd ordered to reimburse the state of Michigan for the services received on this case that included The Medicaid policy. I exercised my rights to the freedom of information act to retain the history of welfare reform services received in this case. In the information I received from the Michigan Department of human services, it clearly recognizes the mother from the dates of 2001 to 2005 was not in possession of these children, and they were in fact living in the domicile under the care of Abraham Flores, The 3rd parte to the case, Whom was receiving the payments of child support. It also recognized in their files as stated to me in a separate document that the mother in the year of 2003 had the children on and was receiving services supplied by the state of Michigan for cash assistance and food stamps. As law would enforce ignorance to the law is no excuse,It is clearly Spelled out and documented in the files of the Michigan Department of human services that there was no entitlement for the state to receive federal funding for the reimbursement of title 4D, And the mother knowingly applied and received services offer by the state of Michigan for food stamps, cash assistance and Medical coverage in the form of Medicaid. All files retained on hand by Mr Douglas Richardson are formally being submitted to this United States Attorneys office for further investigation, for the receipt of Federal funding under fraudulent claims and welfare fraud.